PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIFZX vs. FNSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund (FIFZX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIFZX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FNSOX's 0.27% return.


FIFZX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.35%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*

FNSOX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FIFZX
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund
0.23%7.15%1.41%5.54%-13.46%-1.96%7.65%5.12%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.27%6.01%3.90%4.90%-5.76%-1.25%4.28%3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FIFZX and FNSOX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2019

0.84

The correlation between FIFZX and FNSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIFZX vs. FNSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIFZX
FIFZX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FIFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSOX
FNSOX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FNSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund (FIFZX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIFZXFNSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.50

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

8.25

-2.88

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the FNSOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIFZX and FNSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIFZXFNSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.78

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.55

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.83

-0.58

Drawdowns

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIFZX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, which is greater than FNSOX's maximum drawdown of -8.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFZX and FNSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIFZXFNSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-8.92%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-1.47%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-1.51%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-8.77%

-9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-0.70%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-1.73%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.45%

+0.52%

Volatility

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund (FIFZX) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) at 0.65%. This indicates that FIFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIFZXFNSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

0.65%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

1.51%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

2.07%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

2.89%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.63%

2.47%

+3.16%

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIFZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSOX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIFZX vs. FNSOX - Dividend Comparison

FIFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than FNSOX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIFZX
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund
4.01%3.87%3.66%3.09%1.74%1.42%3.20%1.64%0.00%0.00%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.22%2.80%1.74%0.81%0.80%1.54%2.61%2.04%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIFZX and FNSOX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIFZX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to FNSOX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFZX dropped -19.27% vs FNSOX's -8.92%.

FNSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIFZX and FNSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer