FIFGX vs. SRUUF
FIFGX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused) and SRUUF (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) are both mutual funds - FIFGX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity, while SRUUF is a Uranium fund actively managed by Sprott. Over the past 5 years, FIFGX returned 74.93%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for SRUUF. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FIFGX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRUUF.
Performance
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIFGX achieves a 42.94% return, which is significantly higher than SRUUF's -5.95% return.
FIFGX
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 28.71%
- YTD
- 42.94%
- 1Y
- 46.94%
- 3Y*
- 145.76%
- 5Y*
- 74.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 50.76%
SRUUF
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- -18.66%
- YTD
- -5.95%
- 1Y
- 11.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $17.95M | $11.53M | $8.97M |
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused | 42.94% | 7.44% | 6.34% | 781.04% | 9.30% | 6.48% |
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | -5.95% | 12.66% | -18.89% | 82.09% | 7.65% | 17.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIFGX and SRUUF is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FIFGX and SRUUF shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIFGX vs. SRUUF — Risk / Return Rank
FIFGX
SRUUF
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIFGX | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.10 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.56 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 1.01 | +7.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, smaller than the maximum SRUUF drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFGX and SRUUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIFGX | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.47% | -48.68% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.42% | -24.40% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.42% | -48.68% | +32.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.47% | -48.68% | +19.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.37% | -26.94% | +20.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -21.89% | +14.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 13.61% | -8.66% |
Volatility
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) is 7.12%, while Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that FIFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRUUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIFGX | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 8.41% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.45% | 22.78% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.17% | 34.11% | -11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 406.32% | 41.46% | +364.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 329.38% | 41.42% | +287.96% |
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIFGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SRUUF's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIFGX vs. SRUUF - Dividend Comparison
FIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIFGX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused | 3.81% | 5.44% | 4.73% | 1.54% | 12.64% | 35.77% | 3.10% | 1.59% |
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIFGX and SRUUF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRUUF has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to FIFGX (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFGX dropped -29.47% vs SRUUF's -48.68%.
FIFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIFGX and SRUUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer