PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 14.31%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.


FIDU

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.53%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
14.31%

TOLZ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.51%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.93%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%22.22%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.31%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and TOLZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FIDU and TOLZ has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
TOLZ

Industrials

92.1%
5.2%

Technology

6.4%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
0.8%

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
2.0%

Utilities

0.1%
22.2%

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
35.4%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Real Estate

-

8.0%

Industrials

FIDU
92.1%
TOLZ
5.2%

Technology

FIDU
6.4%
TOLZ
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
1.0%
TOLZ
0.8%

Basic Materials

FIDU
0.2%
TOLZ

-

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
TOLZ
2.0%

Utilities

FIDU
0.1%
TOLZ
22.2%

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
TOLZ

-

Energy

FIDU
0.0%
TOLZ
35.4%

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
TOLZ

-

Consumer Defensive

FIDU

-

TOLZ
4.5%

Real Estate

FIDU

-

TOLZ
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDUTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.71

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

8.20

+0.89

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDUTOLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.36

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.48

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.41

+0.25

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, which is greater than TOLZ's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-39.33%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-5.18%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-11.94%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-21.85%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-39.33%

-2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-3.13%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-6.63%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.71%

+1.25%

Volatility

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.37%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

3.37%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

8.20%

+5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

10.29%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

13.99%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

16.29%

+4.02%

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDU vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.66%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to TOLZ (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, FIDU leads with 14.31% vs 7.75% for TOLZ. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.95% for FIDU.

FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.46% for TOLZ.

FIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer