PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 14.31%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.


FIDU

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.53%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
14.31%

PRN

1D
0.59%
1M
6.86%
YTD
41.80%
6M
45.38%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
18.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.93%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%22.22%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
41.80%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and PRN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.86

The correlation between FIDU and PRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIDU vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
PRN

Industrials

92.1%
79.3%

Technology

6.4%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

0.2%
1.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.1%

Utilities

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
1.6%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

FIDU
92.1%
PRN
79.3%

Technology

FIDU
6.4%
PRN
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
1.0%
PRN
1.2%

Basic Materials

FIDU
0.2%
PRN
1.8%

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
PRN
0.1%

Utilities

FIDU
0.1%
PRN

-

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
PRN

-

Energy

FIDU
0.0%
PRN
1.6%

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
PRN

-

Consumer Defensive

FIDU

-

PRN

-

Real Estate

FIDU

-

PRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDUPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.63

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

15.45

-6.35

FIDU vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDUPRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.29

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.52

+0.14

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-59.88%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-14.15%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-30.78%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-34.84%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-36.27%

-6.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.47%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-10.84%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.23%

-1.27%

Volatility

FIDU vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) is 5.27%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that FIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

10.95%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

23.22%

-9.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

28.66%

-12.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

25.03%

-6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

24.17%

-3.86%

FIDU vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDU vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than PRN's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and PRN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to FIDU (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 18.51% vs 14.31% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FIDU has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PRN is Momentum. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer