PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIDU having a 14.14% return and FLJP slightly lower at 13.96%.


FIDU

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
14.14%
6M
14.45%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
14.15%

FLJP

1D
1.03%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
13.96%
6M
14.90%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.14%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%5.10%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
13.96%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%15.76%18.99%-14.01%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and FLJP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.62

The correlation between FIDU and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIDU vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
FLJP

Industrials

92.1%
25.0%

Technology

6.4%
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
12.4%

Basic Materials

0.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
15.7%

Utilities

0.1%
1.2%

Communication Services

0.0%
6.1%

Energy

0.0%
0.9%

Healthcare

0.0%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Industrials

FIDU
92.1%
FLJP
25.0%

Technology

FIDU
6.4%
FLJP
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
1.0%
FLJP
12.4%

Basic Materials

FIDU
0.2%
FLJP
5.0%

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
FLJP
15.7%

Utilities

FIDU
0.1%
FLJP
1.2%

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
FLJP
6.1%

Energy

FIDU
0.0%
FLJP
0.9%

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
FLJP
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

FIDU

-

FLJP
3.9%

Real Estate

FIDU

-

FLJP
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDUFLJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.32

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

8.08

+0.32

FIDU vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDUFLJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.61

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.49

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.43

+0.22

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, which is greater than FLJP's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and FLJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-32.49%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-13.30%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-14.17%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-32.49%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-2.24%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-9.36%

+4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.81%

-0.85%

Volatility

FIDU vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.73%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

15.09%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

19.21%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

17.81%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

17.82%

+2.50%

FIDU vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIDU vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FLJP's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.96%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.52%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and FLJP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLJP has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FIDU (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

On 5-year performance, FIDU leads with 12.89% vs 8.77% for FLJP. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FIDU has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLJP.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.96% for FIDU.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FLJP is Japan Equities. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.09% for FLJP.

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and FLJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer