PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 13.91%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.38% annualized return.


FIDU

1D
-1.01%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.87%
YTD
16.82%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
13.91%

FBND

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
2.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
16.82%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%22.22%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.12%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and FBND is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.07

Over the past year, FIDU and FBND have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDUFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.18

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.51

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

4.20

+3.29

FIDU vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-17.25%

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-2.66%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-5.94%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-17.25%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-17.25%

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-1.80%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-3.33%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

0.95%

+2.06%

Volatility

FIDU vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.26%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

1.26%

+5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

2.92%

+11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

3.80%

+14.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

5.93%

+12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

6.10%

+14.24%

FIDU vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDU vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.72%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.94%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and FBND have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDU has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to FBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 10-year performance, FIDU leads with 13.91% vs 2.38% for FBND. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.94% for FIDU.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.36% for FBND.

FIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer