PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDPX vs. TBGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDPX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDPX has underperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.92% annualized return.


FIDPX

1D
-0.81%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
1.27%
6M
3.78%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
7.26%

TBGVX

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.94%
6M
11.25%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDPX
Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio
1.27%34.77%-2.40%15.20%-3.10%6.20%6.81%22.76%-9.16%13.54%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
9.94%23.86%2.47%12.48%-7.52%15.62%-1.00%14.64%-6.72%15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDPX and TBGVX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2015

0.68

The correlation between FIDPX and TBGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDPX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDPX
FIDPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FIDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TBGVX
TBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDPXTBGVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.00

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.34

6.43

-4.08

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the TBGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDPX and TBGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDPXTBGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

1.99

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.63

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.75

-0.37

Drawdowns

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDPX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum TBGVX drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDPX and TBGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDPXTBGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-50.97%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-9.56%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-11.45%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-17.71%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.28%

-31.18%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.91%

-1.65%

-8.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-6.08%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.96%

+0.92%

Volatility

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 2.67%. This indicates that FIDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDPXTBGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

2.67%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

7.78%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

9.61%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

11.11%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

12.67%

+2.38%

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDPX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison

FIDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than TBGVX's 11.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDPX
Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio
4.94%3.48%5.12%4.47%4.38%4.54%3.91%4.32%5.23%4.63%4.65%3.92%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
11.02%12.11%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.10%3.16%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDPX and TBGVX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDPX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to TBGVX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDPX dropped -31.28% vs TBGVX's -50.97%.

TBGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDPX and TBGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer