FIDPX vs. QIACX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX).
FIDPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Feb 8, 2015. QIACX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDPX Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio | 3.54% | 34.77% | -2.40% | 15.20% | -3.10% | 6.20% | 6.81% | 22.76% | -9.16% | 13.54% |
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund | -4.89% | 21.15% | 31.07% | 23.52% | -14.16% | 31.40% | 21.95% | 26.91% | -2.64% | 21.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDPX achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly higher than QIACX's -4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDPX has underperformed QIACX with an annualized return of 7.65%, while QIACX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.59% annualized return.
FIDPX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
QIACX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIDPX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank
FIDPX
QIACX
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDPX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 1.15 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.67 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.38 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 6.70 | +1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDPX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.15 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.84 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.55 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDPX and QIACX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison
FIDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than QIACX's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDPX Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio | 4.13% | 3.48% | 5.12% | 4.47% | 4.38% | 4.54% | 3.91% | 4.32% | 5.23% | 4.63% | 4.65% | 3.92% |
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund | 4.81% | 4.58% | 8.65% | 1.40% | 10.90% | 17.44% | 3.01% | 3.34% | 8.60% | 0.69% | 1.12% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDPX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum QIACX drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDPX and QIACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDPX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.28% | -60.11% | +28.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | -11.99% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.25% | -23.05% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.28% | -36.47% | +5.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -5.88% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -9.36% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.46% | +0.36% |
Volatility
FIDPX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes International Dividend Strategy Portfolio (FIDPX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) at 5.39%. This indicates that FIDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIDPX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 5.39% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 9.95% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 16.22% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.13% | 17.39% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 18.72% | -3.69% |