PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDLX vs. FLCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FIDLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.02%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*

FLCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDLX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z
0.02%19.77%26.52%23.65%-7.81%25.99%8.97%31.90%-8.31%13.58%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
0.00%18.58%25.08%22.21%-8.85%24.54%7.70%30.36%-9.25%13.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDLX and FLCCX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017

1.00

The correlation between FIDLX and FLCCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDLX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDLX
FIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCCX
FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDLXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.73

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

2.43

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.73

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.96

4.65

+0.31

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDLX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDLXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.73

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.71

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.43

+0.30

Drawdowns

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDLX drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDLX and FLCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDLXFLCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-65.81%

+28.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-5.10%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-19.06%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-22.04%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

-4.23%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-15.48%

+10.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.82%

-0.04%

Volatility

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) has a higher volatility of 0.02% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FIDLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDLXFLCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.02%

0.00%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

4.21%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.08%

8.06%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

16.44%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.59%

+0.33%

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDLX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDLX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

FIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than FLCCX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDLX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z
5.87%5.87%6.23%3.56%2.42%6.64%5.53%8.55%17.01%6.13%0.00%0.00%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
6.79%6.79%6.81%3.27%1.77%6.87%5.44%8.90%18.35%7.06%1.65%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FIDLX and FLCCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDLX has higher volatility (0.02%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDLX dropped -37.51% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

FIDLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDLX and FLCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer