PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDFX vs. FCMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIDFX having a 25.12% return and FCMVX slightly higher at 25.21%.


FIDFX

1D
2.06%
1M
5.80%
YTD
25.12%
6M
23.24%
1Y
40.12%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*

FCMVX

1D
2.07%
1M
5.70%
YTD
25.21%
6M
23.58%
1Y
40.44%
3Y*
45.44%
5Y*
25.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDFX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z
25.12%13.16%14.66%22.69%-10.52%34.11%1.15%23.72%-18.82%12.19%
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
25.21%12.62%87.16%23.07%-10.26%34.12%0.52%23.65%-18.69%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDFX and FCMVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

1.00

The correlation between FIDFX and FCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDFX vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDFX
FIDFX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FIDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMVX
FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDFXFCMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

4.19

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.78

16.07

-0.29

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the FCMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDFX and FCMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDFX drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FCMVX drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDFX and FCMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDFXFCMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.98%

-44.63%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-10.21%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-38.56%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-38.56%

+14.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-9.29%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.65%

+0.03%

Volatility

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDFXFCMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

5.59%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

12.69%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

16.78%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

60.62%

-40.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.63%

47.65%

-26.02%

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIDFX and FCMVX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

FIDFX vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison

FIDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than FCMVX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
3.95%6.68%76.67%1.29%1.68%1.39%2.19%1.68%2.99%0.77%
FIDFX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z
6.32%8.32%10.60%1.30%13.40%1.43%2.11%2.03%15.16%9.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FIDFX and FCMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDFX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to FCMVX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDFX dropped -44.98% vs FCMVX's -44.63%.

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDFX and FCMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer