FIDEX vs. FBGRX
FIDEX (Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FIDEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FIDEX returned 20.90%/yr vs 32.54%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIDEX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.
Performance
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDEX achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return.
FIDEX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 32.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- 1Y
- 44.98%
- 3Y*
- 32.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 21.88%
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDEX Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund | 13.79% | 15.80% | 21.44% | 24.99% | -8.88% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 18.56% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDEX and FBGRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FIDEX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIDEX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FIDEX
FBGRX
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (FIDEX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDEX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.67 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.95 | 15.56 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDEX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.67 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.68 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDEX drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDEX and FBGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDEX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.90% | -58.64% | +36.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.13% | -12.65% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -27.07% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -12.53% | +8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.98% | -0.87% |
Volatility
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (FIDEX) is 3.92%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that FIDEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIDEX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 4.14% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 13.00% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 17.44% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 24.88% | -6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 23.69% | -5.22% |
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDEX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIDEX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FIDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.60% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
FIDEX Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.87% | 0.46% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FIDEX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FIDEX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDEX dropped -21.90% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.
FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIDEX and FBGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer