PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICS vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICS vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 11.31% return.


FICS

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.83%
6M
3.51%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

VYMI

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.05%
YTD
11.31%
6M
14.77%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICS vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FICS
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF
0.83%20.44%2.59%18.07%-19.47%19.78%2.20%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
11.31%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FICS and VYMI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2020

0.77

The correlation between FICS and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FICS vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FICS
VYMI

Financial Services

28.5%
41.9%

Industrials

27.8%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.5%

Healthcare

9.7%
6.6%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
6.8%

Energy

3.1%
9.5%

Technology

1.8%
4.3%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

5.6%

Financial Services

FICS
28.5%
VYMI
41.9%

Industrials

FICS
27.8%
VYMI
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

FICS
14.2%
VYMI
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FICS
10.0%
VYMI
6.5%

Healthcare

FICS
9.7%
VYMI
6.6%

Communication Services

FICS
4.0%
VYMI
4.0%

Basic Materials

FICS
4.0%
VYMI
6.8%

Energy

FICS
3.1%
VYMI
9.5%

Technology

FICS
1.8%
VYMI
4.3%

Real Estate

FICS

-

VYMI
1.3%

Utilities

FICS

-

VYMI
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICS vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICS
FICS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FICS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FICS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICS vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICSVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.43

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

2.99

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

11.80

-10.83

FICS vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICS Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICS and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICSVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

2.35

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.81

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.65

-0.23

Drawdowns

FICS vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICSVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.16%

-40.00%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-10.14%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-12.84%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.16%

-24.05%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

-1.40%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-6.31%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.57%

+1.03%

Volatility

FICS vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 4.04%. This indicates that FICS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICSVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.04%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

10.73%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

12.94%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

14.84%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.87%

+0.07%

FICS vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICS vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than VYMI's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FICS
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF
1.96%1.85%2.01%1.02%1.89%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.44%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICS and VYMI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICS has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VYMI (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICS dropped -29.16% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 5-year performance, VYMI leads with 11.95% vs 4.92% for FICS. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FICS.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.96% for FICS.

FICS is categorized as Global Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. FICS tracks The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FICS and 0.07% for VYMI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICS and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer