FICDX vs. BBCA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FICDX (Fidelity Canada Fund) and BBCA (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF) are both funds - FICDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while BBCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index. Over the past 5 years, FICDX returned 10.71%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for BBCA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FICDX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBCA.

Performance

FICDX vs. BBCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICDX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than BBCA's 8.72% return.

FICDX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 11.79%
• 1Y: 18.69%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 10.43%

BBCA

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 29.69%
• 3Y*: 21.63%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICDX vs. BBCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FICDX Fidelity Canada Fund	7.97%	25.86%	9.15%	14.66%	-6.14%	26.86%	4.43%	25.82%	-13.57%
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF	8.72%	34.40%	12.79%	14.92%	-12.53%	28.16%	6.20%	28.93%	-15.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FICDX and BBCA is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018	0.96

The correlation between FICDX and BBCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FICDX vs. BBCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICDX

FICDX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FICDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FICDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FICDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FICDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FICDX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BBCA

BBCA Risk / Return Rank: 67
BBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICDX vs. BBCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FICDX	BBCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.21	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.94	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	3.54	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.19	14.56	-6.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FICDX vs. BBCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the BBCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICDX and BBCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FICDX	BBCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.21	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.69	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.61	-0.13

Drawdowns

FICDX vs. BBCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICDX drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, which is greater than BBCA's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICDX and BBCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FICDX	BBCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.09%	-42.81%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.60%	-8.43%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.06%	-12.77%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.01%	-24.43%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-1.27%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-5.87%	-4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	2.04%	+0.25%

Volatility

FICDX vs. BBCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) is 2.76%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that FICDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FICDX	BBCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	3.38%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	10.85%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	13.49%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.95%	16.69%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	20.14%	-2.72%

FICDX vs. BBCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICDX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCA's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FICDX vs. BBCA - Dividend Comparison

FICDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than BBCA's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF	1.74%	1.83%	2.36%	2.51%	2.65%	2.17%	2.41%	2.32%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FICDX Fidelity Canada Fund	5.28%	5.70%	7.44%	3.36%	4.11%	5.16%	2.56%	4.41%	7.33%	0.89%	1.63%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FICDX and BBCA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FICDX and BBCA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FICDX or BBCA?

BBCA has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FICDX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICDX dropped -58.09% vs BBCA's -42.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.