PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICCX vs. CIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I (FICCX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICCX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 34.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FICCX having a 10.36% annualized return and CIGIX not far ahead at 10.43%.


FICCX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.60%
YTD
7.05%
6M
11.69%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
10.36%

CIGIX

1D
0.82%
1M
13.48%
YTD
34.19%
6M
38.88%
1Y
47.10%
3Y*
25.58%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICCX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I
7.05%25.83%9.14%14.69%-6.12%26.90%4.50%25.89%-14.30%12.85%
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
34.19%23.11%12.51%15.33%-30.54%-8.98%44.95%29.69%-20.93%39.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FICCX and CIGIX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FICCX and CIGIX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICCX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICCX
FICCX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FICCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FICCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CIGIX
CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I (FICCX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICCXCIGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

2.17

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.92

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.13

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.59

11.63

-3.04

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICCX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICCXCIGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.17

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.22

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.38

-0.09

Drawdowns

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICCX drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICCX and CIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICCXCIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.09%

-64.46%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-15.88%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.07%

-19.38%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.00%

-50.15%

+29.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

-50.15%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-15.30%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

4.28%

-1.99%

Volatility

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I (FICCX) is 2.67%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that FICCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICCXCIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

9.64%

-6.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

19.73%

-9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

22.87%

-10.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

21.07%

-5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

19.98%

-2.54%

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICCX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

FICCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than CIGIX's 10.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
10.05%13.49%4.54%0.28%0.00%0.33%5.42%0.00%13.25%3.76%0.00%0.13%
FICCX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I
4.29%4.59%7.72%3.36%4.12%5.22%2.47%4.31%7.38%0.89%1.74%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICCX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to FICCX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICCX dropped -58.09% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICCX and CIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer