FIBR vs. MAMB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB).
FIBR and MAMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FIBR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2015. MAMB is a passively managed fund by Monarch that tracks the performance of the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021. Both FIBR and MAMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FIBR vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIBR vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | -0.11% | 8.32% | 6.04% | 8.22% | -13.57% | 1.41% |
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 1.19% | 10.69% | 1.32% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 1.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIBR achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than MAMB's 1.19% return.
FIBR
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
MAMB
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIBR vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIBR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIBR vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank
FIBR
MAMB
FIBR vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIBR | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.38 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 1.95 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 2.43 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | 7.82 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIBR | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.38 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.13 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.14 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIBR and MAMB is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIBR vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison
FIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than MAMB's 2.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | 4.70% | 4.78% | 5.04% | 4.44% | 3.27% | 1.92% | 2.57% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 2.74% | 2.92% | 2.26% |
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 2.46% | 2.47% | 2.11% | 1.73% | 0.92% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIBR vs. MAMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIBR drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, roughly equal to the maximum MAMB drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIBR and MAMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIBR | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.47% | -19.33% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -3.55% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -19.33% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -2.44% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -7.70% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 1.10% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FIBR vs. MAMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) is 1.91%, while Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that FIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIBR | MAMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 2.34% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 4.29% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 6.09% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 6.97% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 6.96% | -2.03% |