FIAT vs. BABO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIAT (YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FIAT returned -0.18% vs 8.62% for BABO. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

FIAT vs. BABO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIAT achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than BABO's -12.48% return.

FIAT

• 1D: 4.32%
• 1M: 16.99%
• YTD: 13.84%
• 6M: 33.71%
• 1Y: -0.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BABO

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: -12.48%
• 6M: -16.80%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIAT vs. BABO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	13.84%	-24.17%	-35.71%
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.48%	46.84%	-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FIAT and BABO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024	-0.27

Return for Risk

FIAT vs. BABO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIAT

FIAT Risk / Return Rank: 10
FIAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FIAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FIAT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FIAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FIAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 12
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIAT vs. BABO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIAT	BABO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	0.25	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	0.64	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.07	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	0.29	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	0.60	-0.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIAT vs. BABO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the BABO Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIAT and BABO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIAT	BABO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00	0.25	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	0.40	-0.78

Drawdowns

FIAT vs. BABO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIAT drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than BABO's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAT and BABO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIAT	BABO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.50%	-29.37%	-41.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.26%	-29.37%	-12.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.94%	-26.47%	-24.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-13.68%	-31.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.32%	14.49%	+12.83%

Volatility

FIAT vs. BABO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) at 12.03%. This indicates that FIAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIAT	BABO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.34%	12.03%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.03%	24.11%	+17.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.49%	35.12%	+20.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.56%	36.77%	+23.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.56%	36.77%	+23.79%

FIAT vs. BABO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIAT and BABO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

FIAT vs. BABO - Dividend Comparison

FIAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.28%, more than BABO's 85.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	85.81%	85.50%	20.65%
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	93.28%	178.11%	70.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIAT and BABO in my portfolio?

FIAT and BABO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIAT or BABO?

FIAT has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to BABO (12.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAT dropped -70.50% vs BABO's -29.37%.

Which ETF is better, FIAT or BABO?

On 1-year performance, BABO leads with 8.62% vs -0.18% for FIAT. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BABO has been the lower-risk option at 12.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIAT or BABO?

Over the 1-year period, BABO has performed better with a 8.62% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIAT or BABO?

FIAT and BABO have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIAT or BABO?

FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 93.28%, compared with 85.81% for BABO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BABO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.