PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYSX vs. QIACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYSX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than QIACX's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FHYSX has underperformed QIACX with an annualized return of 5.32%, while QIACX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.01% annualized return.


FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.40%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
5.32%

QIACX

1D
0.60%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.03%
6M
10.30%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
17.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.36%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.16%8.34%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
8.03%21.15%31.07%23.52%-14.16%31.40%21.95%26.91%-2.64%21.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FHYSX and QIACX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.41

The correlation between FHYSX and QIACX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHYSX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QIACX
QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHYSXQIACXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.13

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.75

3.09

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.45

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.92

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.96

13.70

+3.25

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the QIACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYSX and QIACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHYSXQIACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.13

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.92

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.91

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.58

+0.31

Drawdowns

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYSX drawdown since its inception was -21.45%, smaller than the maximum QIACX drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYSX and QIACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYSXQIACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-60.11%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-8.65%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-19.41%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-23.05%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

-36.47%

+15.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-9.30%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.84%

-1.37%

Volatility

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) is 0.98%, while Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that FHYSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHYSXQIACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

2.56%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

9.51%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

12.01%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.24%

17.38%

-12.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

18.70%

-12.93%

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHYSX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

FHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than QIACX's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.29%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
4.24%4.58%8.65%1.40%10.90%17.44%3.01%3.34%8.60%0.69%1.12%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHYSX and QIACX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIACX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to FHYSX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYSX dropped -21.45% vs QIACX's -60.11%.

FHYSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHYSX and QIACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer