PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHVCX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHVCX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 14.72% return.


FHVCX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.98%
YTD
9.12%
6M
10.38%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.63%
YTD
14.72%
6M
17.88%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHVCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C
9.12%17.25%9.51%16.43%-19.06%12.99%15.60%24.23%-11.51%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
14.72%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FHVCX and FTIHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FHVCX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHVCX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHVCX
FHVCX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FHVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FHVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHVCXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.33

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.16

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.93

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.78

11.58

+1.20

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHVCX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHVCXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.56

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Drawdowns

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHVCX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHVCX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHVCXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.15%

-35.75%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-11.25%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.74%

-13.15%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-29.99%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-7.22%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.85%

-1.12%

Volatility

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) is 3.38%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FHVCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHVCXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.76%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.93%

12.01%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

14.31%

-4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

15.27%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

16.05%

-1.36%

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHVCX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHVCX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FHVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than FTIHX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHVCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C
3.03%2.32%1.57%1.35%5.19%7.20%4.35%2.78%2.63%0.00%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.43%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FHVCX and FTIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FHVCX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHVCX dropped -29.15% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHVCX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer