FHUMX vs. QILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX).
FHUMX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jul 5, 2020. QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 0.28% | -1.38% | 9.90% | 21.92% | -16.51% | 22.94% | 27.31% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.18% | 19.46% | 40.83% | 39.63% | -24.86% | 30.46% | 22.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHUMX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than QILGX's -9.18% return.
FHUMX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -8.31%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
QILGX
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHUMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHUMX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank
FHUMX
QILGX
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHUMX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.91 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.37 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.16 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 3.79 | -3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHUMX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.91 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.73 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHUMX and QILGX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison
FHUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than QILGX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 8.53% | 8.56% | 0.93% | 4.41% | 2.77% | 4.05% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.41% | 3.09% | 6.60% | 1.47% | 13.57% | 19.44% | 7.47% | 5.07% | 10.33% | 7.40% | 0.55% | 11.76% |
Drawdowns
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHUMX drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum QILGX drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHUMX and QILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHUMX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -53.48% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.32% | -15.55% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.48% | -30.05% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.38% | -12.44% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -9.01% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | 4.75% | -0.11% |
Volatility
FHUMX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) have volatilities of 7.07% and 6.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHUMX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 6.81% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 13.44% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.88% | 19.96% | +4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 21.04% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 21.22% | -0.13% |