FHPFX vs. VUBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX).
FHPFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 17, 2018. VUBFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 24, 2015.
Performance
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHPFX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund | 0.03% | 8.76% | 1.81% | 5.29% | -12.28% | -1.06% | 4.84% | 6.69% | 1.41% |
VUBFX Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares | 0.59% | 5.04% | 5.99% | 5.43% | -0.53% | 0.03% | 1.95% | 3.34% | 0.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHPFX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than VUBFX's 0.59% return.
FHPFX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- —
VUBFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHPFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VUBFX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FHPFX vs. VUBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FHPFX
VUBFX
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHPFX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 5.20 | -3.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 10.21 | -8.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 3.61 | -2.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 14.81 | -12.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 67.09 | -60.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHPFX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 5.20 | -3.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 3.34 | -3.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 3.06 | -2.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHPFX and VUBFX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Dividend Comparison
FHPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, which matches VUBFX's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHPFX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund | 4.10% | 4.41% | 4.54% | 3.53% | 1.70% | 0.58% | 3.20% | 3.81% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUBFX Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares | 4.12% | 4.62% | 5.42% | 4.06% | 1.28% | 0.43% | 1.52% | 2.58% | 2.13% | 1.43% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHPFX drawdown since its inception was -17.93%, which is greater than VUBFX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHPFX and VUBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHPFX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.93% | -1.86% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -0.30% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.79% | -1.86% | -15.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -1.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -0.10% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -0.17% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.07% | +0.94% |
Volatility
FHPFX vs. VUBFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) at 0.34%. This indicates that FHPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHPFX | VUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 0.34% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 0.55% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66% | 0.84% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 0.98% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 0.84% | +4.84% |