PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHPFX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHPFX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 14.49% return.


FHPFX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.17%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.71%
YTD
14.49%
6M
16.97%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHPFX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund
0.82%8.76%1.81%5.29%-12.28%-1.06%4.84%6.69%1.41%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
14.49%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FHPFX and FTIHX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.14

Over the past year, FHPFX and FTIHX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHPFX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHPFX
FHPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FHPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FHPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHPFXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.88

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

11.33

-2.78

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHPFX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHPFXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.26

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.55

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.63

-0.29

Drawdowns

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHPFX drawdown since its inception was -17.93%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHPFX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHPFXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-35.75%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-11.25%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-13.15%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-29.99%

+12.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.90%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-7.22%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.85%

-2.02%

Volatility

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) is 1.38%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that FHPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHPFXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

4.86%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

12.05%

-9.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.06%

14.31%

-10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.67%

15.28%

-8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.65%

16.05%

-10.40%

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHPFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHPFX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FHPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than FTIHX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHPFX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund
4.49%4.41%4.54%3.53%1.70%0.58%3.20%3.81%1.16%0.00%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.43%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHPFX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to FHPFX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHPFX dropped -17.93% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHPFX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer