PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHNDX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6 (FHNDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHNDX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 0.30% return.


FHNDX

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.72%
6M
3.83%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.76%

FSPGX

1D
0.83%
1M
-2.42%
6M
1.53%
YTD
0.30%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHNDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6
6.03%14.56%7.19%12.95%-16.38%8.72%13.59%18.58%-6.83%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.30%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FHNDX and FSPGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.81

The correlation between FHNDX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHNDX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHNDX
FHNDX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FHNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FHNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6 (FHNDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHNDXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

0.50

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

1.49

+7.93

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHNDX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHNDX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHNDX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHNDXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-32.66%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-16.17%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

-23.32%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-32.66%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-7.99%

+6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-6.36%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

5.40%

-4.06%

Volatility

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6 (FHNDX) is 2.25%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that FHNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHNDXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

6.43%

-4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

14.04%

-7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

17.51%

-9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.07%

21.80%

-12.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.71%

21.58%

-11.87%

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHNDX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHNDX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FHNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than FSPGX's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHNDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class K6
3.58%2.77%2.62%2.66%5.94%7.22%4.45%3.01%1.37%0.00%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.39%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHNDX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to FHNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHNDX dropped -22.68% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FHNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHNDX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer