PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHMFX vs. VICSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VICSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHMFX achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than VICSX's -0.69% return.


FHMFX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.93%
6M
-1.30%
YTD
-1.00%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.76%

VICSX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.22%
6M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.69%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.67%
ALL TIME*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHMFX
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund
-1.00%8.18%3.13%9.11%-17.03%-1.41%10.15%14.45%-0.24%
VICSX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
-0.69%9.36%3.66%8.88%-14.09%-1.56%9.52%13.99%-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FHMFX and VICSX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FHMFX and VICSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHMFX vs. VICSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHMFX
FHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VICSX
VICSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHMFXVICSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.13

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.01

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.99

2.79

-0.80

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the VICSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHMFX and VICSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHMFX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than VICSX's maximum drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMFX and VICSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHMFXVICSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-20.53%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-2.98%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-5.22%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-20.30%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-2.20%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-3.14%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.08%

+0.06%

Volatility

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VICSX) at 1.03%. This indicates that FHMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHMFXVICSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.03%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.36%

3.11%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

3.90%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

6.17%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

5.34%

+1.13%

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHMFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VICSX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHMFX vs. VICSX - Dividend Comparison

FHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than VICSX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHMFX
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund
4.54%4.70%4.52%4.07%2.65%2.42%3.05%3.90%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VICSX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.43%4.59%4.77%3.70%3.00%2.76%2.77%3.35%3.62%3.22%3.03%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FHMFX and VICSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHMFX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to VICSX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHMFX dropped -22.95% vs VICSX's -20.53%.

VICSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHMFX and VICSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer