PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLSX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLSX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 9.37% return.


FHLSX

1D
0.25%
1M
2.34%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.66%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FHLSX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund
7.13%12.15%6.93%9.70%-0.79%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLSX and FRGAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.89

The correlation between FHLSX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLSX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLSX
FHLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FHLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHLSXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.48

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.27

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

14.61

+0.92

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLSX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHLSXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.55

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.54

-0.53

Drawdowns

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLSX drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLSX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLSXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-11.77%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-7.03%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.66%

-11.77%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-1.58%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.57%

-0.56%

Volatility

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) is 2.03%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that FHLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLSXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

2.75%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.80%

7.19%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

9.03%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.73%

10.31%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

10.31%

-3.32%

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLSX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHLSX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

FHLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FHLSX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund
2.76%2.95%2.89%2.78%3.72%2.71%1.73%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FHLSX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FHLSX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLSX dropped -19.18% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FHLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLSX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer