FHLSX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).

FHLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 2, 2020. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.

Performance

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHLSX Fidelity Health Savings Fund	-0.82%	12.15%	6.93%	9.70%	-14.89%	5.37%	20.55%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund	-8.57%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	61.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLSX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return.

FHLSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -0.82%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 10.08%
• 3Y*: 7.80%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: —

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -9.40%
• YTD: -8.57%
• 6M: -6.17%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 23.48%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLSX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

FHLSX

Fidelity Health Savings Fund

FCNTX

Fidelity Contrafund Fund

Return for Risk

FHLSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLSX

FHLSX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FHLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FHLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FHLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FHLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FHLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLSX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	0.83	+0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.30	+0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.18	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.17	+0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	4.57	+3.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLSX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLSX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	0.83	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.67	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.76	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FHLSX and FCNTX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FHLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLSX Fidelity Health Savings Fund	3.00%	2.95%	2.89%	2.78%	3.72%	2.71%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund	5.10%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Drawdowns

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLSX drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLSX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLSX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-49.19%	+30.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.97%	-11.30%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.18%	-32.59%	+13.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-11.30%	+6.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-8.18%	+3.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	2.90%	-1.77%

Volatility

FHLSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) is 2.64%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that FHLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLSX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	5.19%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.23%	10.56%	-6.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.70%	19.69%	-12.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.64%	19.13%	-12.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.97%	19.61%	-12.64%