PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLFX vs. FTCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than FTCNX's 4.36% return.


FHLFX

1D
-2.03%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.47%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

FTCNX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
4.36%
6M
3.49%
1Y
13.43%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
8.47%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
4.36%25.18%8.57%14.02%-6.70%26.10%3.82%25.08%-13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and FTCNX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.77

The correlation between FHLFX and FTCNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. FTCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCNX
FTCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHLFXFTCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.84

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

5.88

+1.42

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the FTCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and FTCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum FTCNX drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and FTCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLFXFTCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-58.27%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-7.65%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-12.23%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-21.21%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-3.76%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-12.36%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.39%

+0.65%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) at 3.98%. This indicates that FHLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLFXFTCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

3.98%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

10.20%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

12.93%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

16.00%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

17.39%

+0.27%

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHLFX vs. FTCNX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FTCNX's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.19%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
4.92%5.13%6.90%2.83%3.47%4.58%1.99%3.89%6.55%0.90%1.08%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHLFX and FTCNX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHLFX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FTCNX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs FTCNX's -58.27%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLFX and FTCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer