FHLFX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FHLFX returned 8.69%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHLFX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.27% return.

FHLFX

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 6M: 8.18%
• 1Y: 20.64%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: —

LIAGX

• 1D: -5.37%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 26.27%
• 6M: 26.05%
• 1Y: 37.06%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	8.47%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	1.69%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	26.27%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and LIAGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021	0.90

The correlation between FHLFX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHLFX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.70	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.28	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	2.74	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	10.72	-3.42

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLFX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.58%	-37.87%	+4.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-14.56%	+3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.62%	-17.11%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.36%	-37.87%	+8.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-5.37%	+3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-13.11%	+7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	3.71%	-0.67%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) is 5.20%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that FHLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLFX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	12.33%	-7.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	21.12%	-8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.39%	23.48%	-8.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	19.37%	-3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.66%	19.37%	-1.71%

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHLFX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.19%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLFX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

FHLFX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHLFX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to FHLFX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.