PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLFX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 10.70% return.


FHLFX

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.18%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.92%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*

FNILX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.37%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.49%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
8.67%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-12.36%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
10.70%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and FNILX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.76

The correlation between FHLFX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHLFXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.08

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

14.10

-6.97

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHLFXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.33

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.80

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.76

-0.23

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLFXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-33.76%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-9.01%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-19.08%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-25.40%

-3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.77%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-5.37%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.97%

+1.06%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 3.00%. This indicates that FHLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLFXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.00%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

9.01%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

11.96%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

17.25%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

20.04%

-2.40%

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHLFX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.19%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHLFX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FNILX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLFX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer