FHLFX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FHLFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHLFX returned 8.50%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for FCNTX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHLFX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHLFX having a 8.67% return and FCNTX slightly lower at 8.62%.

FHLFX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 6M: 10.92%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: 16.87%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

FCNTX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 27.27%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	8.67%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	21.66%	-10.70%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-16.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and FCNTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.69

The correlation between FHLFX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLFX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.77	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.46	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.20	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	9.33	-2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLFX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.77	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.79	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.78	-0.26

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLFX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.58%	-49.19%	+15.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-11.30%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.62%	-19.75%	+6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.36%	-32.59%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	0.00%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-8.16%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	2.65%	+0.38%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FHLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLFX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	3.30%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	10.47%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.83%	14.02%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.98%	19.15%	-3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	19.68%	-2.04%

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHLFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.19%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLFX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FHLFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHLFX or FCNTX?

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FCNTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.