FHLFX vs. EXOSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX).
FHLFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 17, 2018. EXOSX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Jul 9, 2002.
Performance
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | -1.92% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | -7.05% | 16.21% | 3.33% | 19.89% | -24.26% | 11.50% | 27.07% | 27.52% | -14.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly higher than EXOSX's -7.05% return.
FHLFX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
EXOSX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EXOSX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHLFX vs. EXOSX — Risk / Return Rank
FHLFX
EXOSX
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHLFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.17 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 0.35 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.05 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.15 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 0.56 | +5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHLFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.17 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.09 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLFX and EXOSX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Dividend Comparison
FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than EXOSX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.53% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.22% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 0.82% | 1.85% | 0.86% | 1.72% | 0.91% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum EXOSX drawdown of -55.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and EXOSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.58% | -55.50% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -11.77% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.36% | -37.71% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -11.38% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -11.12% | +4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.05% | -0.09% |
Volatility
FHLFX vs. EXOSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) at 5.78%. This indicates that FHLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHLFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.78% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 9.88% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 16.27% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 16.51% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 16.59% | +1.02% |