FHKTX vs. LNGZX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FHKTX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M) and LNGZX (Columbia Greater China Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FHKTX returned 13.23%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for LNGZX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHKTX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for LNGZX.

Performance

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKTX achieves a 29.33% return, which is significantly higher than LNGZX's -12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKTX has outperformed LNGZX with an annualized return of 13.23%, while LNGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.

FHKTX

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -3.30%
• 6M: 20.34%
• YTD: 29.33%
• 1Y: 60.06%
• 3Y*: 28.53%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 13.23%

LNGZX

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -5.03%
• 6M: -17.72%
• YTD: -12.78%
• 1Y: -4.01%
• 3Y*: 3.06%
• 5Y*: -11.21%
• 10Y*: 2.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	29.33%	41.85%	22.53%	-0.84%	-24.32%	-14.20%	46.95%	34.26%	-17.96%	50.94%
LNGZX Columbia Greater China Fund	-12.78%	27.49%	12.29%	-18.70%	-28.42%	-25.21%	46.04%	32.95%	-20.01%	59.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKTX and LNGZX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2008	0.92

The correlation between FHKTX and LNGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHKTX vs. LNGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKTX

FHKTX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FHKTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FHKTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FHKTX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FHKTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FHKTX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LNGZX

LNGZX Risk / Return Rank: 2
LNGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LNGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LNGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LNGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
LNGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHKTX	LNGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	-0.15	+2.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	-0.06	+3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	0.99	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.57	-0.14	+5.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.80	-0.30	+16.10

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the LNGZX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKTX and LNGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKTX drawdown since its inception was -58.83%, smaller than the maximum LNGZX drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKTX and LNGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKTX	LNGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.83%	-73.37%	+14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.83%	-23.54%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	-26.71%	+4.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.33%	-60.85%	+10.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.83%	-67.94%	+9.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.34%	-54.51%	+47.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.02%	-26.62%	+7.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	10.71%	-6.90%

Volatility

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to Columbia Greater China Fund (LNGZX) at 6.65%. This indicates that FHKTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKTX	LNGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.16%	6.65%	+3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.98%	16.04%	+3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.99%	21.61%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.70%	29.99%	-5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	26.59%	-4.02%

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGZX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHKTX vs. LNGZX - Dividend Comparison

FHKTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than LNGZX's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	0.98%	1.27%	1.10%	1.27%	0.29%	10.88%	4.51%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	14.81%
LNGZX Columbia Greater China Fund	2.15%	1.88%	1.21%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	4.29%	1.40%	5.85%	1.20%	0.00%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHKTX and LNGZX in my portfolio?

FHKTX and LNGZX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHKTX or LNGZX?

FHKTX has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to LNGZX (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKTX dropped -58.83% vs LNGZX's -73.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.