PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FHKIX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FHKIX vs. FTIHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX).

FHKIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FTIHX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016.

Performance

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHKIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I		8.35%42.60%23.15%-0.28%-23.85%-13.71%47.80%35.11%-17.43%51.93%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund		1.79%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKIX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's 1.79% return.

FHKIX

1D
2.70%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
8.35%
6M
7.83%
1Y
46.42%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
12.46%

FTIHX

1D
2.98%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
1.79%
6M
5.81%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I

Fidelity Total International Index Fund

Often compared with FHKIX:
FHKIX vs. MCDFXFHKIX vs. FHKTXFHKIX vs. CAFFHKIX vs. FIQFXFHKIX vs. GSAGXFHKIX vs. BGCBXFHKIX vs. CHILX
Often compared with FTIHX:
FTIHX vs. FSPSXFTIHX vs. FZILXFTIHX vs. VXUSFTIHX vs. VTIAXFTIHX vs. FSGGXFTIHX vs. SWISXFTIHX vs. FSMAX

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.

FHKIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund

Return for Risk

FHKIX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FHKIX
FHKIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FHKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FHKIXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.74

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

2.32

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.38

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.29

9.30

+1.98

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKIX and FTIHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FHKIXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.74

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.48

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.56

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FHKIX and FTIHX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FHKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than FTIHX's 2.73% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I		1.70%1.84%1.44%1.89%1.04%10.81%4.90%0.65%0.79%0.44%1.40%15.62%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund		2.73%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%

Drawdowns

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKIX drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKIX and FTIHX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

FHKIXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.42%

-35.75%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-11.25%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.83%

-29.99%

-23.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.42%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.39%

-8.61%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-7.31%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

2.88%

+1.27%

Volatility

FHKIX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 7.78%. This indicates that FHKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

FHKIXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

7.78%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

11.04%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.25%

16.05%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

15.09%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

16.02%

+6.08%