PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKFX vs. FEMKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKFX achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than FEMKX's 28.21% return.


FHKFX

1D
1.34%
1M
9.00%
YTD
35.18%
6M
38.31%
1Y
68.41%
3Y*
27.98%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

FEMKX

1D
1.69%
1M
9.75%
YTD
28.21%
6M
30.66%
1Y
58.46%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
35.18%38.51%5.42%12.10%-24.50%-4.15%17.85%9.64%-8.52%
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
28.21%31.02%7.12%15.16%-27.48%1.25%32.56%33.67%-12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKFX and FEMKX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FHKFX and FEMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKFX vs. FEMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKFX
FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMKX
FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHKFXFEMKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.56

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

4.51

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.76

17.09

+3.67

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is comparable to the FEMKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKFX and FEMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHKFXFEMKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62

3.10

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.33

+0.11

Drawdowns

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKFX drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, smaller than the maximum FEMKX drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKFX and FEMKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKFXFEMKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-71.14%

+25.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-13.00%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-19.13%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.10%

-40.88%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-25.95%

+8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.43%

-0.12%

Volatility

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) have volatilities of 7.75% and 7.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKFXFEMKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

7.92%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

16.07%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

18.92%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

18.90%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

18.68%

+1.02%

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMKX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHKFX vs. FEMKX - Dividend Comparison

FHKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than FEMKX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
0.04%0.05%0.65%1.11%0.77%6.00%1.39%1.71%0.83%0.08%0.67%0.51%
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
1.76%2.38%2.86%2.43%2.56%3.46%1.38%2.28%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FHKFX and FEMKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEMKX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to FHKFX (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKFX dropped -45.47% vs FEMKX's -71.14%.

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKFX and FEMKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer