FHKCX vs. FSELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX).
FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995. FSELX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.
Performance
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 8.35% | 42.56% | 23.15% | -0.29% | -23.87% | -13.69% | 47.85% | 35.12% | -17.43% | 51.94% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 7.19% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 59.16% | 44.33% | 64.50% | -12.01% | 34.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKCX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than FSELX's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKCX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 32.33% annualized return.
FHKCX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
FSELX
- 1D
- 7.19%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 97.02%
- 3Y*
- 46.40%
- 5Y*
- 31.60%
- 10Y*
- 32.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHKCX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
FHKCX
FSELX
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKCX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 2.40 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 3.02 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 5.65 | -2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 22.93 | -11.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKCX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.40 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.82 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.93 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKCX and FSELX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FSELX's 10.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 10.36% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
Drawdowns
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKCX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKCX and FSELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKCX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -82.54% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.90% | -17.23% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.82% | -46.37% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.41% | -46.37% | -12.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -8.22% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.37% | -28.82% | +8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 4.24% | -0.09% |
Volatility
FHKCX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) is 9.78%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that FHKCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKCX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 12.78% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.55% | 25.83% | -9.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 41.39% | -18.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 38.69% | -14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 34.78% | -12.67% |