FHKCX vs. FHKIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX).
FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995. FHKIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 8.35% | 42.56% | 23.15% | -0.29% | -23.87% | -13.69% | 47.85% | 35.12% | -17.43% | 51.94% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 5.50% | 42.60% | 23.15% | -0.28% | -23.85% | -13.71% | 47.80% | 35.11% | -17.43% | 51.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKCX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than FHKIX's 5.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHKCX having a 12.46% annualized return and FHKIX not far behind at 12.16%.
FHKCX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
FHKIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 43.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHKCX vs. FHKIX — Risk / Return Rank
FHKCX
FHKIX
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKCX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.87 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 2.41 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.51 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 9.74 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKCX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.87 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.12 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKCX and FHKIX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Dividend Comparison
FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FHKIX's 1.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 1.74% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.89% | 1.04% | 10.81% | 4.90% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.44% | 1.40% | 15.62% |
Drawdowns
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKCX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than FHKIX's maximum drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKCX and FHKIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKCX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -58.42% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.90% | -15.94% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.82% | -53.83% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.41% | -58.42% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -10.80% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.37% | -18.84% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 4.11% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FHKCX vs. FHKIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) at 9.27%. This indicates that FHKCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKCX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 9.27% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.55% | 16.45% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 23.16% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 23.95% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 22.09% | +0.02% |