PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHHFX vs. DRIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z (FHHFX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHHFX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than DRIKX's 11.64% return.


FHHFX

1D
1.31%
1M
2.92%
YTD
12.80%
6M
12.79%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*

DRIKX

1D
1.03%
1M
1.23%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.35%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHHFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z
12.80%21.23%15.70%20.09%-18.97%16.30%17.94%26.65%-11.82%
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
11.64%19.29%17.19%21.26%-15.32%21.28%14.20%25.63%-13.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FHHFX and DRIKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FHHFX and DRIKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHHFX vs. DRIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHHFX
FHHFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FHHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FHHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIKX
DRIKX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DRIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z (FHHFX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHHFXDRIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.42

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

14.63

-0.66

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the DRIKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHHFX and DRIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHHFX drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, smaller than the maximum DRIKX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHHFX and DRIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHHFXDRIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.38%

-33.48%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-8.59%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.18%

-16.02%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.64%

-23.49%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.66%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-4.23%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.94%

+0.06%

Volatility

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z (FHHFX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) at 4.57%. This indicates that FHHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHHFXDRIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

4.57%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

9.57%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

11.88%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

14.92%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

15.78%

+0.77%

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHHFX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIKX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHHFX vs. DRIKX - Dividend Comparison

FHHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than DRIKX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.32%1.24%2.44%3.19%3.92%2.37%2.41%2.12%2.27%1.18%1.39%
FHHFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z
3.75%2.83%5.00%1.90%6.22%8.65%4.89%3.31%3.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FHHFX and DRIKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHHFX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DRIKX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHHFX dropped -31.38% vs DRIKX's -33.48%.

DRIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHHFX and DRIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer