FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO
FHH.TO (First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF) and LONG.TO (CI Global Longevity Economy Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. FHH.TO is passively managed, while LONG.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FHH.TO returned 4.14%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for LONG.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHH.TO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than LONG.TO's 7.98% return.
FHH.TO
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
LONG.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHH.TO First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF | 9.08% | 5.83% | 9.13% | -6.00% | -8.34% | 22.83% | 13.26% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 7.98% | 6.19% | 25.86% | 19.50% | -9.01% | 11.77% | 22.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHH.TO and LONG.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FHH.TO
LONG.TO
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF (FHH.TO) and CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHH.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.28 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 4.55 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.83%, which is greater than LONG.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHH.TO and LONG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHH.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.83% | -23.65% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -16.39% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.20% | -22.45% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -23.65% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -2.87% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -5.64% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 4.61% | +0.15% |
Volatility
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF (FHH.TO) is 5.58%, while CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that FHH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHH.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 7.03% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 14.80% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 17.62% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.56% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 17.80% | -1.09% |
Dividends
FHH.TO vs. LONG.TO - Dividend Comparison
FHH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while LONG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHH.TO First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF | 0.59% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.23% | 0.39% | 5.28% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHH.TO and LONG.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and CI.
Find the right allocation for FHH.TO and LONG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer