FHGLX vs. URFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHGLX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHGLX returned 8.35%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for URFFX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHGLX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHGLX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 12.60% return.

FHGLX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: —

URFFX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 13.26%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6	9.37%	19.05%	14.37%	16.96%	-17.32%	14.17%	16.83%	25.99%	-7.55%	7.68%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	12.60%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FHGLX and URFFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.96

The correlation between FHGLX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHGLX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHGLX

FHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHGLX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.45	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.43	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.45	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	3.40	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.84	14.88	-2.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHGLX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHGLX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.45	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.69	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.47	+0.27

Drawdowns

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHGLX drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHGLX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHGLX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.20%	-44.25%	+15.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-7.89%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.33%	-14.14%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.75%	-23.76%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-5.92%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.80%	-0.06%

Volatility

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHGLX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	3.33%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	8.71%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.65%	10.95%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.45%	13.87%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.06%	14.36%	-0.30%

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHGLX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHGLX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than URFFX's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6	7.70%	7.75%	6.74%	1.89%	10.32%	9.73%	6.38%	7.66%	12.29%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.74%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHGLX and URFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FHGLX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHGLX or URFFX?

FHGLX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to URFFX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHGLX dropped -29.20% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.