FHGFX vs. LTIUX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHGFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A) and LTIUX (Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHGFX returned 9.76%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for LTIUX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHGFX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTIUX.

Performance

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHGFX achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's 6.70% return.

FHGFX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 13.40%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 30.11%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: —

LTIUX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHGFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A	13.40%	22.31%	13.29%	20.11%	-19.22%	15.98%	17.43%	26.20%	-11.97%
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund	6.70%	14.26%	14.13%	16.51%	-17.48%	14.07%	15.70%	23.48%	-11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FHGFX and LTIUX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.96

The correlation between FHGFX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHGFX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHGFX

FHGFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FHGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FHGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FHGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FHGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FHGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

LTIUX

LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHGFX	LTIUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.03	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	2.91	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.38	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	2.66	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	11.84	+2.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHGFX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHGFX	LTIUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.03	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.60	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.48	+0.20

Drawdowns

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHGFX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHGFX and LTIUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHGFX	LTIUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.31%	-49.65%	+18.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-6.57%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.57%	-11.08%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.96%	-24.23%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-6.71%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.47%	+0.66%

Volatility

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) at 2.62%. This indicates that FHGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHGFX	LTIUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	2.62%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	6.96%	+3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	8.62%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	11.83%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	12.49%	+4.38%

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHGFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHGFX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

FHGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than LTIUX's 8.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHGFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A	3.40%	2.48%	2.19%	1.78%	6.20%	8.41%	4.70%	3.24%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund	8.46%	9.03%	9.46%	4.17%	7.50%	7.06%	5.35%	7.28%	7.75%	5.46%	4.28%	5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHGFX and LTIUX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FHGFX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHGFX or LTIUX?

FHGFX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to LTIUX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHGFX dropped -31.31% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.