FHGFX vs. FNSFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHGFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A) and FNSFX (Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHGFX returned 9.76%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for FNSFX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHGFX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FNSFX.

Performance

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHGFX having a 13.40% return and FNSFX slightly higher at 13.86%.

FHGFX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 13.40%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 30.11%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: —

FNSFX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 15.75%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHGFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A	13.40%	22.31%	13.29%	20.11%	-19.22%	15.98%	17.43%	26.20%	-11.97%
FNSFX Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K	13.86%	23.84%	14.14%	20.59%	-18.20%	16.68%	18.40%	25.44%	-12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FHGFX and FNSFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	1.00

The correlation between FHGFX and FNSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHGFX vs. FNSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHGFX

FHGFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FHGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FHGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FHGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FHGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FHGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FNSFX

FNSFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FNSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FNSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FNSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FNSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FNSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHGFX	FNSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.50	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	3.45	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.46	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.28	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	14.58	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FNSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHGFX and FNSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHGFX	FNSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.50	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.70	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.74	-0.06

Drawdowns

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHGFX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FNSFX drawdown of -30.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHGFX and FNSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHGFX	FNSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.31%	-30.92%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-9.76%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.57%	-15.41%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.96%	-27.31%	-0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-5.60%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.19%	-0.06%

Volatility

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHGFX	FNSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.23%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	10.55%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	12.80%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	15.01%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	15.96%	+0.91%

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHGFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSFX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHGFX vs. FNSFX - Dividend Comparison

FHGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than FNSFX's 4.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHGFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A	3.40%	2.48%	2.19%	1.78%	6.20%	8.41%	4.70%	3.24%	3.06%	0.00%
FNSFX Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K	4.89%	3.70%	2.32%	2.13%	10.66%	10.24%	3.89%	5.99%	5.94%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHGFX and FNSFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FHGFX and FNSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHGFX or FNSFX?

FNSFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FHGFX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHGFX dropped -31.31% vs FNSFX's -30.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.