FHGFX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHGFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FHGFX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHGFX returned 9.76%/yr vs 17.08%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHGFX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHGFX achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return.

FHGFX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 13.40%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 30.11%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHGFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A	13.40%	22.31%	13.29%	20.11%	-19.22%	15.98%	17.43%	26.20%	-11.97%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	-16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FHGFX and FBGRX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.86

The correlation between FHGFX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHGFX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHGFX

FHGFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FHGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FHGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FHGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FHGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FHGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHGFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.67	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	3.41	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.45	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.67	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	15.56	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHGFX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHGFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.67	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.69	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.68	0.00

Drawdowns

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHGFX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHGFX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHGFX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.31%	-58.64%	+27.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-12.65%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.57%	-27.07%	+11.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.96%	-43.08%	+15.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-12.53%	+6.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.98%	-0.85%

Volatility

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A (FHGFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHGFX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.14%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	13.00%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	17.44%	-4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	24.88%	-9.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	23.69%	-6.82%

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHGFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHGFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FHGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FHGFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class A	3.40%	2.48%	2.19%	1.78%	6.20%	8.41%	4.70%	3.24%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHGFX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FHGFX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHGFX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FHGFX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHGFX dropped -31.31% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.