PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHFCX vs. FNSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C (FHFCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHFCX achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly lower than FNSFX's 13.86% return.


FHFCX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.68%
YTD
12.13%
6M
13.74%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
10.98%

FNSFX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.14%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.75%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHFCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C
12.13%21.88%12.52%17.99%-18.90%14.89%16.37%25.38%-9.15%6.51%
FNSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K
13.86%23.84%14.14%20.59%-18.20%16.68%18.40%25.44%-8.82%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FHFCX and FNSFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

1.00

The correlation between FHFCX and FNSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHFCX vs. FNSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHFCX
FHFCX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FHFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FHFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSFX
FNSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C (FHFCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHFCXFNSFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.50

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

3.45

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.28

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.20

14.58

-2.38

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FNSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHFCX and FNSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHFCXFNSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.50

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.70

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.74

-0.14

Drawdowns

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHFCX drawdown since its inception was -31.37%, roughly equal to the maximum FNSFX drawdown of -30.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHFCX and FNSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHFCXFNSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.37%

-30.92%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-9.76%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.23%

-15.41%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-27.31%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-5.60%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.19%

+0.07%

Volatility

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C (FHFCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHFCXFNSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.23%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

10.55%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.80%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

15.01%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.96%

-0.45%

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHFCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSFX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHFCX vs. FNSFX - Dividend Comparison

FHFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than FNSFX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHFCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C
5.90%4.87%0.72%1.13%10.21%8.69%4.46%5.83%9.51%2.76%3.68%3.45%
FNSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K
4.89%3.70%2.32%2.13%10.66%10.24%3.89%5.99%5.94%2.45%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FHFCX and FNSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHFCX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FNSFX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHFCX dropped -31.37% vs FNSFX's -30.92%.

FNSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHFCX and FNSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer