PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHFCX vs. DRIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C (FHFCX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHFCX having a 12.13% return and DRIKX slightly higher at 12.38%. Over the past 10 years, FHFCX has underperformed DRIKX with an annualized return of 10.98%, while DRIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.


FHFCX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.68%
YTD
12.13%
6M
13.74%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
10.98%

DRIKX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.02%
YTD
12.38%
6M
13.14%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHFCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C
12.13%21.88%12.52%17.99%-18.90%14.89%16.37%25.38%-9.15%20.36%
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.38%19.29%17.19%21.26%-15.32%21.28%14.20%25.63%-9.16%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FHFCX and DRIKX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between FHFCX and DRIKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHFCX vs. DRIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHFCX
FHFCX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FHFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FHFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIKX
DRIKX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DRIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C (FHFCX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHFCXDRIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.66

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

16.03

-3.83

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the DRIKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHFCX and DRIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHFCXDRIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.81

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.80

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.81

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.81

-0.21

Drawdowns

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHFCX drawdown since its inception was -31.37%, smaller than the maximum DRIKX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHFCX and DRIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHFCXDRIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.37%

-33.48%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-8.59%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.23%

-16.02%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-23.49%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.37%

-33.48%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-4.24%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.89%

+0.37%

Volatility

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C (FHFCX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) at 3.11%. This indicates that FHFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHFCXDRIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

3.11%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

8.69%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

11.20%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

14.83%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.75%

-0.24%

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHFCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIKX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHFCX vs. DRIKX - Dividend Comparison

FHFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than DRIKX's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.31%1.24%2.44%3.19%3.92%2.37%2.41%2.12%2.27%1.18%1.39%0.00%
FHFCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class C
5.90%4.87%0.72%1.13%10.21%8.69%4.46%5.83%9.51%2.76%3.68%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHFCX and DRIKX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHFCX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to DRIKX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHFCX dropped -31.37% vs DRIKX's -33.48%.

DRIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHFCX and DRIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer