PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHDDX vs. FHBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M (FHBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHDDX achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than FHBCX's 9.31% return.


FHDDX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.23%
YTD
13.24%
6M
15.23%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*

FHBCX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.94%
YTD
9.31%
6M
10.64%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
13.24%22.85%16.77%20.77%-18.91%16.49%18.00%26.74%-11.77%
FHBCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M
9.31%17.75%10.16%16.99%-18.76%13.54%16.09%24.98%-11.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FHDDX and FHBCX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FHDDX and FHBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHDDX vs. FHBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHDDX
FHDDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FHBCX
FHBCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FHBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M (FHBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHDDXFHBCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.37

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

3.32

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.05

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.55

13.20

+1.35

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHDDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FHBCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHDDX and FHBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHDDXFHBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.37

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.63

+0.10

Drawdowns

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHDDX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than FHBCX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHDDX and FHBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHDDXFHBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-29.19%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-7.44%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-11.76%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-26.69%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-5.89%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.72%

+0.46%

Volatility

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M (FHBCX) at 3.35%. This indicates that FHDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHDDXFHBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.35%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

7.96%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

9.68%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

12.48%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

14.69%

+2.23%

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHDDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FHBCX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHDDX vs. FHBCX - Dividend Comparison

FHDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than FHBCX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHBCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M
3.27%2.60%1.98%1.65%5.40%7.47%4.63%3.08%2.90%
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
3.33%2.49%5.24%2.04%6.20%8.33%4.63%3.09%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FHDDX and FHBCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHDDX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to FHBCX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHDDX dropped -31.34% vs FHBCX's -29.19%.

FHDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHDDX and FHBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer