PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHBCX vs. JIEHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M (FHBCX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHBCX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than JIEHX's 12.46% return.


FHBCX

1D
1.18%
1M
2.52%
YTD
10.36%
6M
10.41%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*

JIEHX

1D
1.22%
1M
1.96%
YTD
12.46%
6M
12.11%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHBCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M
10.36%17.75%10.16%16.99%-18.76%13.54%16.09%24.98%-11.38%
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
12.46%20.12%15.37%18.47%-18.03%18.48%16.08%25.00%-11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FHBCX and JIEHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.98

The correlation between FHBCX and JIEHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHBCX vs. JIEHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHBCX
FHBCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FHBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FHBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

JIEHX
JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M (FHBCX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHBCXJIEHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.08

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

13.37

-0.38

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHBCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the JIEHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHBCX and JIEHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHBCX drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, smaller than the maximum JIEHX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHBCX and JIEHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHBCXJIEHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

-32.55%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.44%

-9.18%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-16.15%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.69%

-25.70%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.97%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.11%

-0.36%

Volatility

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M (FHBCX) is 4.40%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that FHBCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIEHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHBCXJIEHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.16%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

10.61%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

12.83%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.59%

15.36%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

16.47%

-1.76%

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHBCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than JIEHX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHBCX vs. JIEHX - Dividend Comparison

FHBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than JIEHX's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHBCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class M
3.24%2.60%1.98%1.65%5.40%7.47%4.63%3.08%2.90%0.00%
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
3.15%3.55%1.76%2.17%6.57%5.15%3.18%6.88%6.99%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FHBCX and JIEHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIEHX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FHBCX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHBCX dropped -29.19% vs JIEHX's -32.55%.

JIEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHBCX and JIEHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer