PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCCX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's 12.01% return.


FHCCX

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-22.16%
1Y
-5.48%
3Y*
-2.55%
5Y*
-2.61%
10Y*
5.39%

FZROX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.79%
YTD
12.01%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
-5.48%-5.49%3.20%3.02%-13.72%10.43%20.15%26.96%-10.79%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.01%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCCX and FZROX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FHCCX and FZROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCCX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCCX
FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCCXFZROXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

2.47

-2.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.12

3.36

-3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.45

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

3.39

-3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.36

15.66

-16.02

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCCX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCCXFZROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

2.47

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.77

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.73

-0.27

Drawdowns

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCCXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.28%

-34.96%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-8.89%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

-19.38%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

-25.12%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.77%

0.00%

-23.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-5.51%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.26%

1.92%

+12.34%

Volatility

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 2.99%. This indicates that FHCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCCXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

2.99%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.60%

9.22%

+13.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

12.22%

+11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.54%

17.44%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

20.13%

-0.56%

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCCX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FZROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%17.59%0.00%0.00%8.32%6.85%0.41%6.43%0.00%0.00%7.84%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHCCX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCCX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FZROX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCCX dropped -45.28% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCCX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer