FHCCX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FHCCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C | -9.80% | -5.49% | 3.20% | 3.02% | -13.72% | 10.43% | 20.15% | 26.96% | 6.37% | 23.12% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 5.57%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FHCCX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -9.80%
- 6M
- -16.82%
- 1Y
- -13.69%
- 3Y*
- -3.33%
- 5Y*
- -3.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHCCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FHCCX
FSKAX
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHCCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | 0.83 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | 1.29 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.19 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.04 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 5.05 | -6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHCCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 0.83 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.59 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.72 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHCCX and FSKAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.32% | 6.85% | 0.41% | 6.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.84% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHCCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.28% | -35.01% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -12.42% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.67% | -25.39% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.67% | -35.01% | +5.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.25% | -8.92% | -18.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -4.05% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | 2.57% | +8.51% |
Volatility
FHCCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FHCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHCCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 4.42% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.17% | 9.40% | +12.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.40% | 18.50% | +6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 17.38% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 18.42% | +1.13% |