PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCCX vs. FBTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than FBTAX's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX has underperformed FBTAX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while FBTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


FHCCX

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-22.16%
1Y
-5.48%
3Y*
-2.55%
5Y*
-2.61%
10Y*
5.39%

FBTAX

1D
-3.05%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-4.16%
1Y
44.32%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
-5.48%-5.49%3.20%3.02%-13.72%10.43%20.15%26.96%6.37%23.12%
FBTAX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A
-0.83%39.54%5.37%10.70%-7.95%-3.10%32.17%25.74%-3.86%25.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCCX and FBTAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.83

The correlation between FHCCX and FBTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FHCCX
FBTAX

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FHCCX
100.0%
FBTAX
100.0%

Basic Materials

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Communication Services

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Consumer Defensive

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Energy

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Financial Services

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Industrials

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Real Estate

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Technology

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Utilities

FHCCX

-

FBTAX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCCX vs. FBTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCCX
FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTAX
FBTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCCXFBTAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

2.10

-2.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.12

2.87

-2.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

5.18

-5.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.36

15.20

-15.57

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FBTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCCX and FBTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCCXFBTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

2.10

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.40

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.43

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.31

+0.15

Drawdowns

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, smaller than the maximum FBTAX drawdown of -63.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and FBTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCCXFBTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.28%

-63.55%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-8.91%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

-32.86%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

-36.51%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.67%

-38.82%

+9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.77%

-8.91%

-14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-21.22%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.26%

3.03%

+11.23%

Volatility

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) is 5.07%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that FHCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCCXFBTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

7.10%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.60%

16.71%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

22.10%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.54%

23.47%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

24.42%

-4.85%

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCCX vs. FBTAX - Dividend Comparison

FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTAX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A
1.47%1.45%6.00%1.15%0.00%20.12%8.37%6.77%2.50%0.00%0.00%5.36%
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%17.59%0.00%0.00%8.32%6.85%0.41%6.43%0.00%0.00%7.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHCCX and FBTAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTAX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to FHCCX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCCX dropped -45.28% vs FBTAX's -63.55%.

FBTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCCX and FBTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer