PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FHAPX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FHAPX and ^GSPC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FHAPX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.79%
6.72%
FHAPX
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FHAPX:

1.26

^GSPC:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

FHAPX:

1.76

^GSPC:

2.20

Omega Ratio

FHAPX:

1.23

^GSPC:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

FHAPX:

1.59

^GSPC:

2.46

Martin Ratio

FHAPX:

6.61

^GSPC:

10.01

Ulcer Index

FHAPX:

2.22%

^GSPC:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

FHAPX:

11.70%

^GSPC:

12.88%

Max Drawdown

FHAPX:

-32.66%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

FHAPX:

-1.74%

^GSPC:

-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAPX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.


FHAPX

YTD

4.09%

1M

0.46%

6M

2.78%

1Y

12.99%

5Y*

6.20%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

2.24%

1M

-1.20%

6M

6.72%

1Y

18.21%

5Y*

12.53%

10Y*

11.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FHAPX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHAPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FHAPX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FHAPX is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FHAPX is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FHAPX is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FHAPX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FHAPX is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FHAPX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FHAPX, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.261.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for FHAPX, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.762.20
The chart of Omega ratio for FHAPX, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.231.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for FHAPX, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.592.46
The chart of Martin ratio for FHAPX, currently valued at 6.61, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.006.6110.01
FHAPX
^GSPC

The current FHAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAPX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.26
1.62
FHAPX
^GSPC

Drawdowns

FHAPX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAPX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAPX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.74%
-2.13%
FHAPX
^GSPC

Volatility

FHAPX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) is 3.16%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FHAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.16%
3.43%
FHAPX
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab