PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHANX vs. URFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHANX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FHANX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHANX having a 13.91% return and URFFX slightly higher at 13.97%.


FHANX

1D
1.25%
1M
0.65%
6M
9.45%
YTD
13.91%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.33%

URFFX

1D
0.81%
1M
1.45%
6M
10.23%
YTD
13.97%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.17%
ALL TIME*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHANX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHANX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
13.91%22.68%16.50%20.52%-19.09%16.27%17.81%26.33%-14.80%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
13.97%19.35%11.86%18.12%-15.66%17.70%10.52%20.16%-10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FHANX and URFFX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FHANX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHANX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHANX
FHANX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FHANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FHANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

URFFX
URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHANX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FHANX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHANXURFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.22

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

13.80

-2.35

FHANX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHANX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHANX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHANX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHANX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHANX and URFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHANXURFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.31%

-44.25%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-7.89%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-14.14%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.83%

-23.76%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-5.87%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.84%

+0.48%

Volatility

FHANX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FHANX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) at 2.96%. This indicates that FHANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHANXURFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.96%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

9.79%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

11.84%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

13.97%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

14.34%

+2.61%

FHANX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHANX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHANX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FHANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than URFFX's 5.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHANX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
3.24%2.41%5.23%1.94%5.86%8.01%4.12%2.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.67%6.46%2.61%3.39%11.40%8.13%6.25%11.76%10.21%5.55%3.91%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FHANX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHANX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to URFFX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHANX dropped -31.31% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHANX and URFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer